From: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: ghio@temp0094.myriad.ml.org (Matthew Ghio)
Message Hash: e28b3350ee0d21a1416a1db41ebbbd8eb55486752ca9588d7ee6952baf58086f
Message ID: <199706070117.UAA26367@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <199706070111.SAA15372@myriad.alias.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-07 01:26:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 09:26:27 +0800
From: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 09:26:27 +0800
To: ghio@temp0094.myriad.ml.org (Matthew Ghio)
Subject: Re: Who subscribes to the list?
In-Reply-To: <199706070111.SAA15372@myriad.alias.net>
Message-ID: <199706070117.UAA26367@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Matthew Ghio wrote:
> William H. Geiger III wrote:
> > >P.S. I'm sure none of you would be foolish enough to use penet-style
> > >remailers which do not encrypt the message headers.
> > Your point being??
>
>
> While I am sure most readers of this list are well aware that remailed
> messages which are not encrypted and chained are not secure, there is a
> class of users who are not yet aware of this fact. I was pointing out
> the relative ease with which their identities could be compromised by
> someone simply logging DNS traffic. In addition, there was some recent
> discussion over whether or not it was possible to obtain the subscriber
> list from cyberpass.net and algebra.com. Even if the subscriber list
> is not published, there is an alternative method to determine who
> subscribes to the list.
>
> There are, of course, other methods, such as Return-Receipt headers and
> embedded html tags, but tracking DNS traffic tends to be easy to do on
> a wide scale without alerting the subjects that you are investigating.
>
Another danger of using remailers without encryption is that it is very
easy to compromise one's identity due to little mistakes and malformed
messages.
- Igor.
Return to June 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”