cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-06-10 - NoneRe: Assassination Politics as revenge fantasy (Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh)

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: e63343ccfec2bdec90c77377ec56437eaba8bae2e7ada39b90d5c78897224a65
Message ID: <199706101102.NAA05299@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970609112236.19258B-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-10 11:09:33 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 19:09:33 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 19:09:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: NoneRe: Assassination Politics as revenge fantasy (Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970609112236.19258B-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Message-ID: <199706101102.NAA05299@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> wrote:

        Moral issues aside, one of the problems plaguing
        Bell's scheme is that it's not limited to
        eliminating "government thugs who violate your
        rights," as he likes to describe it. If it
        existed, anyone with some spare change could
        wipe out a nosy neighbor or even an irritating
        grocery store clerk.

Not likely, but for another reason.  Assuming you had the money to take
out your neighbor, it's going to be fairly obvious who did it.  (How many
neighbors do you have?  Pretty short list of suspects.)

Also, killing some nobody in a grocery store is more prone to error, and
less widely witnessed, and therefore harder to collect payment on, thus
less profitable.

The possibility of Microsoft killing their competition's engineers is
somewhat more realistic, although lately they've been hiring a lot of
them instead, so maybe they don't want to kill them. :)

Thread