From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: f3e900c46a6768147c59e05169c5194251818a7bb48327b29ac9ed44d531fd23
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970626142951.381D-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <199706251336.GAA26072@fat.doobie.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-27 00:06:25 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 08:06:25 +0800
From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 08:06:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Top ATM maker signs deal with eye-scanning technology firm
In-Reply-To: <199706251336.GAA26072@fat.doobie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970626142951.381D-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> TRENTON, N.J. (June 24, 1997 9:38 p.m. EDT) -- NCR Corp., the world's
> top maker of automated teller machines, plans to start offering
> machines that identify the user by scanning the eye.
This is not a good idea for ATMs, I have said this many times before:
At present unauthorised use of someones account involves stealing their
ATM card and PIN, which is insured against if reported soon anyway. If
biometric ID becomes commonplace theivery of this kind involves either:
1. Gouging out someones eyeball (would this actually work or would the
damage done to the eye render it useless?)
Or, more likely:
2. Kidnapping the account holder and forcing them to ID themselves at
gunpoint/knifepoint.
I would sure as hell rather have the inconvenience of going home and
calling the CC company to report a stolen card, than be kidnapped and
possible harmed for a few $.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
Return to June 1997
Return to “Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>”