1997-07-15 - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal
Header Data
From: Alan <alano@teleport.com>
To: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
Message Hash: 61a0880cf19c5b9bacfbbef0423568ba3270f91b66ee0d0b9c7d62c2335c8dd5
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970715133913.16101D-100000@linda.teleport.com>
Reply To: <v0300780eaff17f63f464@[163.176.132.90]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-15 20:49:45 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 04:49:45 +0800
Raw message
From: Alan <alano@teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 04:49:45 +0800
To: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
Subject: Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal
In-Reply-To: <v0300780eaff17f63f464@[163.176.132.90]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970715133913.16101D-100000@linda.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Lee Tien wrote:
>
> Does anyone know who the judge is, what the case name/# is? I tried to
> find information about the case on the Web last night, came up with nothing
> resembling legal papers.
There is no case law on it (yet). It is currently a law being challenged
(or about to be) in court. Something Orrin "I have to look good for the
Church" Hatch dreamed up.
alano@teleport.com | "Those who are without history are doomed to retype it."
Thread
Return to July 1997
- Return to “Alan <alano@teleport.com>”
- Return to “Lee Tien <tien@well.com>”
Return to “Martin Janzen <janzen@idacom.hp.com>”
- 1997-07-15 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 01:44:35 +0800) - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal - Martin Janzen <janzen@idacom.hp.com>
- 1997-07-15 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 03:43:24 +0800) - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
- 1997-07-15 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 04:49:45 +0800) - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal - Alan <alano@teleport.com>
- 1997-07-15 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 03:43:24 +0800) - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>