1997-07-15 - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal

Header Data

From: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: d71bc46bfd9084d670431cbf70a11ad719e3f92f001fe83e1203739cb30f61f0
Message ID: <v0300780eaff17f63f464@[163.176.132.90]>
Reply To: <9707151736.AA27385@sabel.idacom.hp.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-15 19:43:24 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 03:43:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 03:43:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal
In-Reply-To: <9707151736.AA27385@sabel.idacom.hp.com>
Message-ID: <v0300780eaff17f63f464@[163.176.132.90]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Does anyone know who the judge is, what the case name/# is?  I tried to
find information about the case on the Web last night, came up with nothing
resembling legal papers.

Lee

Thread

• Return to July 1997

• Return to “Alan <alano@teleport.com>”
• Return to “Lee Tien <tien@well.com>”

• Return to “Martin Janzen <janzen@idacom.hp.com>”

• 1997-07-15 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 01:44:35 +0800) - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal - Martin Janzen <janzen@idacom.hp.com>
  • 1997-07-15 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 03:43:24 +0800) - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
    • 1997-07-15 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 04:49:45 +0800) - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal - Alan <alano@teleport.com>