1997-07-15 - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal

Header Data

From: Alan <alano@teleport.com>
To: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
Message Hash: 61a0880cf19c5b9bacfbbef0423568ba3270f91b66ee0d0b9c7d62c2335c8dd5
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970715133913.16101D-100000@linda.teleport.com>
Reply To: <v0300780eaff17f63f464@[]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-15 20:49:45 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 04:49:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan <alano@teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 04:49:45 +0800
To: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
Subject: Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal
In-Reply-To: <v0300780eaff17f63f464@[]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970715133913.16101D-100000@linda.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Lee Tien wrote:

> Does anyone know who the judge is, what the case name/# is?  I tried to
> find information about the case on the Web last night, came up with nothing
> resembling legal papers.

There is no case law on it (yet).  It is currently a law being challenged
(or about to be) in court.  Something Orrin "I have to look good for the
Church" Hatch dreamed up.

alano@teleport.com | "Those who are without history are doomed to retype it."