From: Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e5135cfb6e64d0a6667ca281ff295d8200f097994fc8bf0a89f188f1a5be7518
Message ID: <19970727234600.3398.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-28 00:47:36 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 08:47:36 +0800
From: Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 08:47:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
Message-ID: <19970727234600.3398.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
Ian Goldberg <iang@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:
> 2. Their cracker changes the state of 2^128 bits in 33 minutes. This is
> being extremely generous;
> (Actually, for all I know, terawatt power sources
> may exist; that's out of my field. Please let me know if this is the case.
Not within a few million miles of here, and they'd be hard to conceal.
A few GW is fairly easy, by several methods.
Terrestrial fusion is not a serious contender yet, and I doubt
it will be for a long time.
> 3. They have a quantum computer, or some alien technology, or something
> else we know pretty much nothing about.
> Given this choice, I would vote for #3. :-) However, I'd go out on a limb
> and say that the NSA guy was simply lying (or that the anecdote itself is
> mistaken).
I agree. The 'something else' could be info about RNG flaws I suppose.
This guy couldn't be thinking about DES could he ?
Return to July 1997
Return to “Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>”