From: Harry Tuttle Remailer <h_tuttle@rigel.cyberpass.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f7844720a3bc3352a7706a0fd1b392b70386afe587d5510479e833f9b0902b59
Message ID: <199707280920.CAA07789@rigel.cyberpass.net>
Reply To: <19970727234600.3398.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-28 09:33:16 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:33:16 +0800
From: Harry Tuttle Remailer <h_tuttle@rigel.cyberpass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:33:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <19970727234600.3398.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
Message-ID: <199707280920.CAA07789@rigel.cyberpass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sun, Jul 27, 1997 at 11:46:00PM -0000, Secret Squirrel wrote:
> Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
>
> Ian Goldberg <iang@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:
> > 2. Their cracker changes the state of 2^128 bits in 33 minutes. This is
> > being extremely generous;
>
> > (Actually, for all I know, terawatt power sources
> > may exist; that's out of my field. Please let me know if this is the case.
>
>
> Not within a few million miles of here, and they'd be hard to conceal.
>
> A few GW is fairly easy, by several methods.
Terawatts for a few microseconds is fairly standard technology, I
believe. Femtosecond laser pulses driven by *very* large capacitor
banks...
> Terrestrial fusion is not a serious contender yet, and I doubt
> it will be for a long time.
It's easy to generate lots of power through fusion. The problem is
confinement.
Return to July 1997
Return to “Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>”