From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: enoch@zipcon.net
Message Hash: 2452ea2caae2c552db75a32eeb82c74074a6b48087b92f279b222c362c61f11a
Message ID: <199708080936.KAA01816@server.test.net>
Reply To: <19970807192254.40.qmail@zipcon.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-08 10:17:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 18:17:24 +0800
From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 18:17:24 +0800
To: enoch@zipcon.net
Subject: Re: Exit Remailer Suggestion
In-Reply-To: <19970807192254.40.qmail@zipcon.net>
Message-ID: <199708080936.KAA01816@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike Duvos <enoch@zipcon.net> writes:
> Someone wrote:
(That someone was me).
> > What about AOL disks? We need shorter lived, disposable
> > remailers as exit remailers... Let them take the heat,
> > while the real remailers walk. Lets see a series of
> > "exitman" remailers. Exitman remailers are walking targets
> > left to fend for themselves as long as they may.
>
> By reconfiguring current remailers to use a public Email service
> as the last link in the chain, we tap a potentially infinite
> supply of disposable accounts, on advertising-supported service
> providers with skins as thick as those of the bulk emailers.
>
> Sounds like a plan to me.
OK, lets _do_ it!
Sounds much easier and less risky than relying on a recreational
cracker to provide a stream of short lived remailers as I was
suggesting.
Adam
--
Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
Return to August 1997
Return to “Mike Duvos <enoch@zipcon.net>”