From: “Paul H. Merrill” <paulmerrill@acm.org>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 683d01b42c15e486a78c2d03d279cfb89bbea9846248e95e2a8a6b6aee9ac35d
Message ID: <33EB8DA7.71C8@acm.org>
Reply To: <wkk5ae1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-08 18:49:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 02:49:42 +0800
From: "Paul H. Merrill" <paulmerrill@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 02:49:42 +0800
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Query on cookies
In-Reply-To: <wkk5ae1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <33EB8DA7.71C8@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>
> "Paul H. Merrill" <paulmerrill@acm.org> writes:
>
> > Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> > >
> > > Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > I believe this is what the folks at Netscape tried to eliminate in 4.0,
> > > > which I'm told features four cookie settings. One rejects "third party
> > > > cookies."
> > >
> > > Blessed are those who believe.
> > >
> > And for those who don't believe there is always Read Only for
> > Cookies.txt.
>
> This won't save cookies to disk, but won't they be around for the duration
> of one session?
>
True, true, but the belief level needed is low and the hysterical data
aspects are gone even if you are still tracking mud around from the
"current" walkabout.
PHM
Return to August 1997
Return to “Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>”