1997-08-25 - Re: Why Not to use PGP 5.0

Header Data

From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
To: Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Message Hash: 6f424e954c94643fb35e325924188673a08551aba4a6597eab550e95b56db4b6
Message ID: <199708250016.TAA20643@mailhub.amaranth.com>
Reply To: <199708250009.UAA02186@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-25 00:20:37 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 08:20:37 +0800

Raw message

From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 08:20:37 +0800
To: Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Subject: Re: Why Not to use PGP 5.0
In-Reply-To: <199708250009.UAA02186@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>
Message-ID: <199708250016.TAA20643@mailhub.amaranth.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <199708250009.UAA02186@yakko.cs.wmich.edu>, on 08/24/97 
   at 08:09 PM, Damaged Justice <frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu> said:

>http://www.shub-internet.org/why_not_pgp_5.html


Well I went to this web page and once again nothing but FUD.

Oh well better luck next time frogfarm,

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                        
- ---------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBNADBHI9Co1n+aLhhAQGiLwP+Jrg2UW92mmj8WDYwadnk5LixmOInSFOa
bgJNuRe3gNNTA6WiN3BOqgDPXpUZS3um2uNWAdpHenVbt7vqM6YDhV6Igephyrer
W+1pUxftCoqQAsPcqoJCyMlLy513dv1NJin4phPO4zDJi9jXcUFJsCUFNKFpJ5TZ
atopyx/H1LU=
=udz1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread