1997-08-08 - Re: disposable remailers (was Re: Eternity Uncensorable?)

Header Data

From: Andy Dustman <andy@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu>
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Message Hash: e70ebcd248ec39151529e0b395d3fa62b18f9070657c43f5fcb940042918c657
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.970807160614.2843G-100000@neptune.chem.uga.edu>
Reply To: <199708071945.UAA04602@server.test.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-08 07:57:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:57:29 +0800

Raw message

From: Andy Dustman <andy@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:57:29 +0800
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: disposable remailers (was Re: Eternity Uncensorable?)
In-Reply-To: <199708071945.UAA04602@server.test.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.970807160614.2843G-100000@neptune.chem.uga.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Adam Back wrote:

> You know how middleman operators work...  they always, always send
> mail via another remailer and never deliver mail to a user.  (I'm not
> sure if they detect this by looking to see if the address is on the
> remailer list, or just always add an extra hop?)

I think by definition a middleman always chains through one or more
additional remailers. When I ran dustbin, it was a "smart middleman",
i.e., if the recipient was a known remailer, it wouldn't bother to chain
(remailers rarely complain), otherwise it would chain through a single
remailer. I have a procmail script which does this as well using mixmaster
only (some definitions are missing here): 

# Smart middle. If not to another remailer, send it through a random mixmaster.
# Mixmaster 2.0.3 compatible.

:0 f
* MIDDLE ?? (on|yes)
*! ? grep "$TO" $RLIST $TYPE2
| formail -bf -I"From:" -I"To:" -I"Comments:" -IMessage-ID: \
        | $MIXPATH/mixmaster -f -to $TO -l 0 

# We made it this far, so send out the mail.

:0
| $SENDMAIL $SENDMAILFLAGS 

An even smarter middleman would detect PGP messages and deliver those
directly to end recipients, since those people are unlikely to complain
about anonymous mail, and chain if the message was plaintext. The risk
involved with this type of middleman operation should be rather small.

Andy Dustman / Computational Center for Molecular Structure and Design / UGA
    To get my PGP public key, send me mail with subject "send file key".
For the ultimate anti-spam procmail recipe, send me mail with subject "spam"
"Encryption is too important to leave to the government."  -- Bruce Schneier
http://www.ilinks.net/~dustman    mailto:andy@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu      <}+++<


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQEPAwUBM+ouuhOPBZTHLz8dAQFMaQfPYwBpG+f05Oq/gu4nZDacu+0DDg/v/EgI
IOZa4GCrNlhfbl0mp0XFLbEWLi8SvwWhpo6nhOFDIda7wcmyo032TfbcajNPEcz7
qeRNBEY2wDwp9B9MaXZlFyThnmnqsfgeU0h/c+txPiV48HsiX2uvG1NEKumqxq+e
R1nqBS6Ob5uP+1urfqAbrdeTPdRSwlx+C9SlxMLLYpoPq5OM8YZu08UOBVWRE2FD
ia4DvHCWVBsj2rpgiDrpWyMHAEbkoy9FJm5qUa2FqZq62TrS0rVugdjsE4mvisjM
ULoalmkRHsByl/qUICRqSpktQQtveq2I3MEIHYSk7tEVJQ==
=0FkI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread