1997-09-19 - Re: directed speech free? request for opinions.

Header Data

From: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
To: Mark Hedges <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 00c06519fd1dda40f9ce23f7d02ed51817c4ac2cb8ce5da190bb6276f5889b0a
Message ID: <v03007803b0488b2d954c@[163.176.132.90]>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970919031102.11529E-100000@sirius.infonex.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-19 19:18:13 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 03:18:13 +0800

Raw message

From: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 03:18:13 +0800
To: Mark Hedges <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: directed speech free? request for opinions.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970919031102.11529E-100000@sirius.infonex.com>
Message-ID: <v03007803b0488b2d954c@[163.176.132.90]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 2:16 AM -0800 9/19/97, Mark Hedges wrote:
>I have seen California law code which seems to indicate that speech
>directed at an individual is not covered under the first amendment.
>
>If you have any thoughts on the matter, please send opinions (not legal
>advice, of course, if you are a lawyer). Also, if you know of any speech
>rights scholars or lawyers willing to answer a few related questions for
>free, I would appreciate the pointer.

I'm confused.  What in California law makes you think that the First
Amendment doesn't apply unless you speak to more than one person?  Assuming
that's what you mean by "speech directed at an individual."

Lee








Thread