From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:21:19 +0800
To: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment
In-Reply-To: <01BCC93A.D0869BA0@dasc12-105.flash.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970925071158.21770B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Michael Brock wrote:

> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I wonder if Mr. Solomon of NY will rethink his decision to not bring 
> up SAFE without Oxley to the entire House after the unprecedented 
> coaltion of companies and individual groups that came together to 
> make sure that mandatory key recovery stays a "1984" like dream.   I 
> find it incomprehensible that one man, would block the introduction 
> of this bill, after it being proved that this is what his 
> constituents want....

What in the world makes you believe that Mr. Solomon's constituents would
want SAFE to go the the floor? SAFE *must* be defeated, with or without
the Oxley ammendment.

-- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP encrypted email preferred.
   "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"