1997-09-25 - Re: Oxley Amendment
Header Data
From: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
To: “‘cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: b3b099f43d5011fd3555a3b94010cd458bb4fd356b9b8b15963e0644dd40abbb
Message ID: <01BCC93A.D0869BA0@dasc12-105.flash.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-25 03:51:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:51:51 +0800
Raw message
From: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:51:51 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment
Message-ID: <01BCC93A.D0869BA0@dasc12-105.flash.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I wonder if Mr. Solomon of NY will rethink his decision to not bring
up SAFE without Oxley to the entire House after the unprecedented
coaltion of companies and individual groups that came together to
make sure that mandatory key recovery stays a "1984" like dream. I
find it incomprehensible that one man, would block the introduction
of this bill, after it being proved that this is what his
constituents want....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBNCndC6kD4Ab4OebpEQJYvQCg1YyRAp1npa4euRQdhh/CKjjbY8MAnRr2
cAljqiyA7E8TNF5wvdKwVBXz
=bsvt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thread
Return to September 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
- Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>”
- Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>”
Return to “Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>”
- 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:51:51 +0800) - Re: Oxley Amendment - Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
- 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:21:19 +0800) - Re: Oxley Amendment - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
- 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:04:48 +0800) - Re: Oxley Amendment - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:25:12 +0800) - Re: Oxley Amendment - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:21:19 +0800) - Re: Oxley Amendment - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>