1997-09-19 - Re: sooner or later

Header Data

From: “David Downey” <digital_matrix@hotmail.com>
To: anon@anon.efga.org
Message Hash: 1f4ef4f909c9852babdf13868c12b9642df7088ca40ac62c4ce77b5554446f82
Message ID: <199709191823.LAA10185@f48.hotmail.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-19 18:31:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:31:40 +0800

Raw message

From: "David Downey" <digital_matrix@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:31:40 +0800
To: anon@anon.efga.org
Subject: Re: sooner or later
Message-ID: <199709191823.LAA10185@f48.hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>Bill Stewart wrote:
>>At 10:45 PM 9/18/97 -0700, Wei Dai wrote:
>>>Many of us believe that a crypto ban is inevitable. The only
>>>question for us is whether it'll happen sooner or later. Seen in
>>>this perspective, all that industry and civil liberties lobbies can
>>>do is delay the ban. But is this necessarily a good thing?
>
>>Yes.  Later is bad, but sooner is worse.  First of all, "Soon" means
>>"We lost already", while "Later" means "We haven't lost yet, even
>>though it looks pretty much like we're going to lose later,...
>
 The only way I see us losing is if we do not stand together. I do see 
that we will need to go underground ofr awhile, but when they see that 
they will always have a problem with us, they will eventually have to 
deal with us. That is unless they want to turn the US into a real life 
version of the movie Red Dawn!

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com






Thread