1997-09-19 - Re: sooner or later

Header Data

From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
To: “David Downey” <digital_matrix@hotmail.com>
Message Hash: 864176de92e558dd0f11ecadb4fb07b99931ed40c17079ae336df14d4a268fc2
Message ID: <199709191959.PAA15928@users.invweb.net>
Reply To: <199709191823.LAA10185@f48.hotmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-19 20:22:56 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 04:22:56 +0800

Raw message

From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 04:22:56 +0800
To: "David Downey" <digital_matrix@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: sooner or later
In-Reply-To: <199709191823.LAA10185@f48.hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <199709191959.PAA15928@users.invweb.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <199709191823.LAA10185@f48.hotmail.com>, on 09/19/97 
   at 11:23 AM, "David Downey" <digital_matrix@hotmail.com> said:

>>Bill Stewart wrote:
>>>At 10:45 PM 9/18/97 -0700, Wei Dai wrote:
>>>>Many of us believe that a crypto ban is inevitable. The only
>>>>question for us is whether it'll happen sooner or later. Seen in
>>>>this perspective, all that industry and civil liberties lobbies can
>>>>do is delay the ban. But is this necessarily a good thing?
>>
>>>Yes.  Later is bad, but sooner is worse.  First of all, "Soon" means
>>>"We lost already", while "Later" means "We haven't lost yet, even
>>>though it looks pretty much like we're going to lose later,...
>>

> The only way I see us losing is if we do not stand together. I do see 
>that we will need to go underground ofr awhile, but when they see that 
>they will always have a problem with us, they will eventually have to 
>deal with us. That is unless they want to turn the US into a real life 
>version of the movie Red Dawn!


Oh I wouldn't be feeling to optimistic with that. We in the
crypto/anarchist community are a very small minority. Our govenrmnet would
have no qualms at all of taking us out. A nice little Reichstag Fire to
turn popular opinion against us and then the storm troopers will be sent
out. If you are expecting some type of popular support of "us" against
"them" I think you are sorely mistaken. The majority of the sheeple would
be all to happy to turn in those evil cryptologist for their 5min of fame.

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                        
- ---------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBNCLNH49Co1n+aLhhAQFT7AP/Z7Kqwr9ovhW8i/cIItOz74Ju/RoQvJ0C
4OCdXh5+YUBECmYKTnTzIPkNzrBBOpQLy8xnaCNHItG1z1OSo1VGVeap4pye2Kpu
n54sLSWB59tnEhN1EWig9qG1aGuG/EAa+yKiG6eNnN/iJh/tk9dp6M5S4BG9n8OM
VNuT+xqI8dQ=
=/uit
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread