1997-09-25 - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)

Header Data

From: Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
To: Jeff Barber <aweissman@mocc.com
Message Hash: 34a6348083735c8a990b1058861db35ff30d465d21dd872fc5ec3280f245c6d7
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19970925123121.03161ac8@dnai.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970925120717.17603A-100000@vorlon.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-25 19:55:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:55:29 +0800

Raw message

From: Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:55:29 +0800
To: Jeff Barber <aweissman@mocc.com
Subject: Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970925120717.17603A-100000@vorlon.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19970925123121.03161ac8@dnai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 03:36 PM 9/25/97 -0400, Jeff Barber wrote:
>We shouldn't have to "trick" Congress into doing the right thing, 

I can't think of any other way. Each congressman has one 
concern:Getting re-elected. Thus, they frame each decision in terms 
of:"How will this sound in a 30 second TV commercial aimed at the 
clueless clods who live in my district/state?" and "Could this be 
exploited by my opponent in a similair commercial?" In order to 
convince a congresscritter to do what you want, you have to put it 
into those terms.

Forget the rule of law, the Constitution, ideals, principles, values -
- - those things are *meaningless* when discussing the making of law in 
this -- or any other --  nation.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNCq8CTKf8mIpTvjWEQKG3ACfVFWLfmeno5HHbrCQdstdn/QSDQQAoIf6
Fh3fqK8ST29ucr2NXsTgi1ec
=OZdo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread