Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu> (27 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: CEI tells the Federal Trade Commission to be wary of regulation

• 1997-04-26 (Fri, 25 Apr 1997 20:02:03 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: CEI tells the Federal Trade Commission to be wary of regulation - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal (fwd)

• 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 21:05:29 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal (fwd)

• 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 21:07:31 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 04:28:45 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>
    • 1997-05-03 (Sat, 3 May 1997 09:19:13 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
      • 1997-05-05 (Tue, 6 May 1997 02:14:09 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>
  • 1997-05-04 (Sun, 4 May 1997 14:14:48 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-05-05 (Tue, 6 May 1997 03:06:06 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>
      • 1997-05-06 (Tue, 6 May 1997 08:10:54 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
        • 1997-05-06 (Tue, 6 May 1997 08:33:18 +0800) - Drifting toward 2nd Amendment arguments (Was: Responses to Tim May’s criticism …) - Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>
      • 1997-05-06 (Tue, 6 May 1997 13:26:02 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
        • 1997-05-07 (Thu, 8 May 1997 01:22:20 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
      • 1997-05-07 (Thu, 8 May 1997 01:35:14 +0800) - OFF-TOPIC: Second Amendment - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-05-07 (Thu, 8 May 1997 02:34:11 +0800) - Constitutional basis for RTKBA? - Thomas Porter <txporter@mindspring.com>
    • 1997-05-05 (Tue, 6 May 1997 04:29:11 +0800) - Terrorists or Freedom Fighters or Rebels? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-05-04 (Sun, 4 May 1997 19:10:31 +0800) - Re: FC: Responses to Tim May’s criticism of SAFE, and a rebuttal - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

Re: SAFE Bill discussion

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 09:25:34 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 18:17:29 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 21:10:52 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
      • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 23:42:07 +0800) - TWO Letters on SAFE - Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@epic.org>
        • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:15:07 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
          • 1997-05-04 (Sun, 4 May 1997 10:34:43 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
        • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:16:29 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 22:04:11 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
      • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 22:20:42 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Mac Norton <mnorton@cavern.uark.edu>
      • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 04:16:13 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
    • 1997-05-02 (Fri, 2 May 1997 22:06:04 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
      • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:21:27 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@vtw.org>
      • 1997-05-02 (Sat, 3 May 1997 00:21:45 +0800) - Re: TWO Letters on SAFE - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
    • 1997-05-03 (Sat, 3 May 1997 15:37:26 +0800) - Re: SAFE Bill discussion - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>

Response to “SAFE bill and cutting crypto-deals”

• 1997-05-15 (Thu, 15 May 1997 14:18:04 +0800) - Response to “SAFE bill and cutting crypto-deals” - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Re: SAFE vote and cutting crypto-deals, report from House Judiciary

• 1997-05-16 (Fri, 16 May 1997 13:46:00 +0800) - Re: SAFE vote and cutting crypto-deals, report from House Judiciary - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Internet knuckle-dragging from the New York Times

• 1997-06-25 (Wed, 25 Jun 1997 10:29:40 +0800) - Internet knuckle-dragging from the New York Times - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

The Big Sellout

• 1997-07-16 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 13:25:20 +0800) - The Big Sellout - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-07-16 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 14:44:58 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
    • 1997-07-16 (Wed, 16 Jul 1997 14:58:39 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 09:07:19 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - Brian Lane <nexus@eskimo.com>
        • 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 09:21:07 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
        • 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 17:08:34 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>
          • 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 23:47:12 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
            • 1997-07-17 (Fri, 18 Jul 1997 06:54:21 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
      • 1997-07-17 (Fri, 18 Jul 1997 03:55:18 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - Doug Peterson <fnorky@geocities.com>
    • 1997-07-16 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 07:41:08 +0800) - Re: The Big Sellout - Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>

HISTORY - pre-CDA, “compromise”, untrue civil-liberties groups (fwd)

• 1997-07-17 (Fri, 18 Jul 1997 06:14:23 +0800) - HISTORY - pre-CDA, “compromise”, untrue civil-liberties groups (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Re: HISTORY - pre-CDA, “compromise”, untrue civil-liberties groups (fwd)

• 1997-07-17 (Fri, 18 Jul 1997 06:15:06 +0800) - Re: HISTORY - pre-CDA, “compromise”, untrue civil-liberties groups (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-07-17 (Fri, 18 Jul 1997 06:47:25 +0800) - Re: HISTORY - pre-CDA, “compromise”, untrue civil-liberties groups (fwd) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>

EPIC letter to CNET.COM and the Internet Community (fwd)

• 1997-07-24 (Thu, 24 Jul 1997 10:18:37 +0800) - EPIC letter to CNET.COM and the Internet Community (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-07-25 (Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:23:37 +0800) - Re: EPIC letter to CNET.COM and the Internet Community (fwd) - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
  • 1997-07-26 (Sat, 26 Jul 1997 23:31:03 +0800) - Re: EPIC letter to CNET.COM and the Internet Community (fwd) - Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>

“Who the hell are CNET?”

• 1997-07-24 (Fri, 25 Jul 1997 07:22:20 +0800) - “Who the hell are CNET?” - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Re: An Attempt to Hobble SAFE Crypto Bill (fwd)

• 1997-07-26 (Sat, 26 Jul 1997 14:34:41 +0800) - Re: An Attempt to Hobble SAFE Crypto Bill (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Note to CyberPatrol’s Susan Getgood (fwd)

• 1997-07-26 (Sat, 26 Jul 1997 14:38:34 +0800) - Note to CyberPatrol’s Susan Getgood (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-09-11 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 04:24:45 +0800) - The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:19:17 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Are we men or mice? Re: House panel votes behind closed doors to build in Big Brother (fwd)

• 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 05:12:49 +0800) - Are we men or mice? Re: House panel votes behind closed doors to build in Big Brother (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 07:42:39 +0800) - Re: Are we men or mice? Re: House panel votes behind closed doors to build in Big Brother (fwd) - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
    • 1997-09-21 (Sun, 21 Sep 1997 15:07:56 +0800) - Re: Are we men or mice? Re: House panel votes behind closed doors to build in Big Brother (fwd) - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)
    • 1997-09-21 (Sun, 21 Sep 1997 16:05:12 +0800) - Re: Are we men or mice? - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)

• 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:38:16 +0800) - Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:12:14 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:25:42 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:57:19 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-09-27 (Sun, 28 Sep 1997 01:21:11 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:06:08 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:09:11 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:55:29 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>

Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman

• 1997-11-03 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 02:49:00 +0800) - Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-11-03 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 06:10:39 +0800) - Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
    • 1997-11-04 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 00:45:28 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
      • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 10:00:59 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
        • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 11:21:30 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
  • 1997-11-03 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 07:10:16 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - Jodi Hoffman <jlhoffm@ibm.net>
    • 1997-11-07 (Fri, 7 Nov 1997 14:05:02 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - “snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  • 1997-11-03 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 07:23:48 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - Lizard <lizard@mrlizard.com>
  • 1997-11-03 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 07:55:35 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
  • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 09:22:01 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
  • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 09:36:16 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
  • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 12:14:46 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - Steve Schear <steve@lvdi.net>
  • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 12:21:57 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - Jesus Christ <jc@dev.null>
  • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:19:53 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - Jodi Hoffman <jlhoffm@ibm.net>
    • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 12:10:18 +0800) - Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 13:28:46 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
      • 1997-11-11 (Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:47:14 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
        • 1997-11-15 (Sat, 15 Nov 1997 14:05:56 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
        • 1997-11-15 (Sat, 15 Nov 1997 14:25:39 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
          • 1997-11-16 (Sun, 16 Nov 1997 10:25:59 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
            • 1997-11-18 (Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:28:15 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
              • 1997-11-22 (Sat, 22 Nov 1997 10:40:54 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
                • 1997-11-21 (Fri, 21 Nov 1997 15:17:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
                  • 1997-11-23 (Sun, 23 Nov 1997 12:54:43 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
                    • 1997-11-23 (Sun, 23 Nov 1997 16:36:16 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
                      • 1997-11-23 (Sun, 23 Nov 1997 17:43:15 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
                      • 1997-11-23 (Mon, 24 Nov 1997 02:49:56 +0800) - Influence as a voter - ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
                        • 1997-11-23 (Mon, 24 Nov 1997 04:01:37 +0800) - Re: Influence as a voter - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
                      • 1997-11-24 (Mon, 24 Nov 1997 17:34:24 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
                    • 1997-11-23 (Mon, 24 Nov 1997 06:57:48 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - Jon Galt <jongalt@pinn.net>
                      • 1997-11-24 (Mon, 24 Nov 1997 20:24:40 +0800) - Re: Will Jews be Forced to Accept Christ in Public Schools? - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
  • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:27:42 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - Lizard <lizard@mrlizard.com>
  • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:40:58 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - hayden@phoenix.net
  • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 12:14:31 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - Jesus Christ <js@dev.null>
  • 1997-11-05 (Wed, 5 Nov 1997 18:39:40 +0800) - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called a ‘Dumb Cunt’ and told to ‘Go Fuck Yourself’ at all costs, by TruthMonger - aileen holovacs <holovacsOMIT@idt.net>

Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-11-12 (Thu, 13 Nov 1997 07:19:45 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Lizard <lizard@mrlizard.com>
    • 1997-11-12 (Thu, 13 Nov 1997 07:26:12 +0800) - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

FC: CEI says Nader’s anti-Microsoft campaign hurts consumers (fwd)

• 1997-11-13 (Fri, 14 Nov 1997 06:35:20 +0800) - FC: CEI says Nader’s anti-Microsoft campaign hurts consumers (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Re: Report on UN conference on Internet and racism

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-11-19 (Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:11:37 +0800) - Re: Report on UN conference on Internet and racism - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-03 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 23:55:28 +0800) - Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 03:03:41 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 03:16:01 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
    • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 06:18:36 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
      • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 07:30:08 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
        • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 08:10:21 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
          • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:15:17 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
            • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 08:34:01 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
              • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:35:30 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
                • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:37:08 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
                • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 19:17:02 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 18:51:19 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - frissell@panix.com
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 22:06:26 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
                  • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 10:01:09 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jon Galt <jongalt@pinn.net>
                • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 04:16:45 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “J. Lasser” <jon@lasser.org>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 08:46:37 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
                    • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 22:51:18 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
                    • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 04:40:51 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 08:07:26 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 09:04:00 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 14:01:16 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
                    • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 06:34:18 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 11:03:38 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 10:09:21 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
                    • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 03:54:35 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 10:19:54 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
                • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 10:26:41 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - frissell@panix.com
                • 1997-12-26 (Sat, 27 Dec 1997 01:51:39 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
              • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 15:16:21 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
                • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 16:11:33 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
            • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 18:50:48 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
          • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 10:19:10 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 08:39:06 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
        • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 11:22:11 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting testicle) - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
          • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 02:05:47 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting testicle) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
            • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:30:16 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting testicle) - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
      • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:02:32 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:06:14 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:39:34 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 11:54:26 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
      • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 13:29:31 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
        • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 01:50:42 +0800) - Kudos to ‘my other brother’ BillyG / Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
      • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 14:37:20 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 14:14:14 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

More on Association for Interactive Media conference

• 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 03:14:49 +0800) - More on Association for Interactive Media conference - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 03:47:53 +0800) - Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 03:55:24 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:10:47 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:38:05 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:38:47 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:43:59 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:46:09 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 05:11:17 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 05:13:31 +0800) - Re: Too many “Internet Conferences” in Washington - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1998-01-07 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 03:54:59 +0800) - Re: More on Association for Interactive Media conference - David Miller <dm0@avana.net>

In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News

• 1998-01-09 (Sat, 10 Jan 1998 01:25:28 +0800) - In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1998-01-09 (Sat, 10 Jan 1998 02:10:03 +0800) - Re: In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-01-09 (Sat, 10 Jan 1998 03:15:48 +0800) - Re: In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News - Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
    • 1998-01-09 (Sat, 10 Jan 1998 04:18:46 +0800) - Re: In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1998-01-10 (Sat, 10 Jan 1998 09:31:08 +0800) - Re: In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1998-01-11 (Sun, 11 Jan 1998 08:18:22 +0800) - Re: In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1998-01-11 (Sun, 11 Jan 1998 12:04:28 +0800) - Re: In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News - “Raymond D. Mereniuk” <Raymond@fbn.bc.ca>

Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast

• 1998-01-21 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 03:59:53 +0800) - Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1998-01-21 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 05:12:51 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 15:45:57 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 15:56:27 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 03:32:50 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>
    • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 04:50:18 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>
  • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 12:41:49 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
  • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 15:04:28 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
    • 1998-01-23 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 10:32:42 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
    • 1998-01-23 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 12:39:51 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
  • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 03:55:48 +0800) - Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast - bill.stewart@pobox.com

Microsoft and DoJ: which one has guns?

• 1998-01-21 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 05:16:56 +0800) - Microsoft and DoJ: which one has guns? - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>

Fear, loathing, and Bill Gates (fwd)

• 1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 06:55:54 +0800) - Fear, loathing, and Bill Gates (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>