cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-12-03 - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)

Header Data

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 72a6fd46a3063715b6b377639624fdaff3b5a231a34983c04cbae15dafb771af
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19971203104756.007e9320@206.40.207.40>
Reply To: <v0300780cb0ab2a8bef6c@[204.254.21.129]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-03 19:16:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 03:16:01 +0800

Raw message

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 03:16:01 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)
In-Reply-To: <v0300780cb0ab2a8bef6c@[204.254.21.129]>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19971203104756.007e9320@206.40.207.40>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 09:44 AM 12/3/97 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>At 8:42 AM -0700 12/3/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>>This is nothing new. Honest (self-identified) leftists like my friend Bob
>>Chatelle complain about the censors on the left almost as much as censors
>>on the right. Other fave leftist censorship causes:
>>
>>-- MacKinnonite antiporn laws (she's a self-identified Marxist, I recall)
>
>And her partner, Andrea Dworkin, belies the oft-quoted notion that someone
>so far to the left comes out a libertarian rightist. No, this chick Dworkin
>is so far left she's just plain _left_. She argues that porn for womyn (or
>is it wimmin?) is fine and dandy, because this represents lesbian
>sisterhood exploring their own blah blah blah, but porn aimed and directed



What you watch is pornography;
What I watch is erotica.






------------------------------------------------------------
      David Honig                   Orbit Technology
     honig@otc.net                  Intaanetto Jigyoubu

Information is a dense, colorless, odorless material readily transmitted
across empty space and arbitrary boundaries by shaking charged particles.

Thread