From: berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
To: Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
Message Hash: a36bc329d4e0c4700d3b4947fb28407020c91f121b83104cd1b8f30e60d9a6a3
Message ID: <348c05e2.11794993@mail.qed.net>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971204135130.369D-100000@is-chief>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-05 14:51:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 22:51:18 +0800
From: berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 22:51:18 +0800
To: Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
Subject: Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971204135130.369D-100000@is-chief>
Message-ID: <348c05e2.11794993@mail.qed.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 4 Dec 1997 17:22:23 -0700 (MST), Jim Burnes wrote:
>In either case, the act of buying and selling things is the ultimate
>expression of free association/assembly. I voluntarily associate
>with the guy who makes my pizza, builds my car, mows my law etc.
Really? I avoid associating with those who mow my laws. Ha ha.
Seriously, I've never lived in Sweden or Singapore -- if I do, I'll get back
to the list on which I prefer -- but I'm troubled by the tendency of
Libertarians to err on the side of big business fetishism rather than civil
liberties. Both are part of the Doctrine, of course*, but I often hear them
argue that wild-west capitalism inevitably leads to political freedom -- so,
not to worry -- but rarely that political freedom invariably leads to
laissez-faire capitalism (so, not to worry).
You might say that the latter is NOT TRUE. Well, right-o, but neither is the
former. Economic progress under a fascist regime leads inevitably to
political freedom? You guys actually make this argument.
Paul
*Yes, Libertarians criticize corporate welfare, but just because it corrupts
the notion that a person's entire worth can be summarized in a stock
portfolio.
http://www.nihidyll.com/gallery/Tornado.jpg
Return to December 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”