1997-09-17 - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE

Header Data

From: f_estema@alcor.concordia.ca
To: Ben Cox <cox+@transarc.com>
Message Hash: 50a672c96d2ebf4c4b1e530e30c91b27292097bf81a7d1793275bd1020c487de
Message ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.970917175939.16243A-100000@alcor.concordia.ca>
Reply To: <v03110709b045fae56b41@[158.98.7.94]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-17 22:11:20 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 06:11:20 +0800

Raw message

From: f_estema@alcor.concordia.ca
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 06:11:20 +0800
To: Ben Cox <cox+@transarc.com>
Subject: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
In-Reply-To: <v03110709b045fae56b41@[158.98.7.94]>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.970917175939.16243A-100000@alcor.concordia.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Ben Cox wrote:

> >I take it this last sentence is intended to kill Bernstein, Karn and Junger
> >and any other cases we might try to bring.  Correct?
> 
> How could that possibly be binding?  Anything the court system thinks is
> subject to judicial review is subject to judicial review.

Didn't Patel rule late last year that that sort of restriction was
nonsense? 






Thread