1997-09-17 - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE

Header Data

From: Ben Cox <cox+@transarc.com>
To: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Message Hash: c619976de9c6fbd95ccf93865380094ee324539e6dc5cc765ebe71582a03cc30
Message ID: <v03110709b045fae56b41@[158.98.7.94]>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19970915161036.00b98760@mail.io.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-17 21:42:19 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 05:42:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Ben Cox <cox+@transarc.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 05:42:19 +0800
To: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Subject: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19970915161036.00b98760@mail.io.com>
Message-ID: <v03110709b045fae56b41@[158.98.7.94]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Carl Ellison says:
>>Decisions made by the Secretary of Commerce with the concurrence of the
>>Secretary of Defense with respect to exports of encryption products under
>>this section shall not be subject to judicial review.
>
>I take it this last sentence is intended to kill Bernstein, Karn and Junger
>and any other cases we might try to bring.  Correct?

How could that possibly be binding?  Anything the court system thinks is
subject to judicial review is subject to judicial review.

-- Ben

Thread

• Return to September 1997

• Return to “Ben Cox <cox+@transarc.com>”
• Return to “Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>”
• Return to “f_estema@alcor.concordia.ca”
• Return to “Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>”
• Return to “Lee Tien <tien@well.com>”
• Return to ““Peter D. Junger” <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>”

• Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”

• 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 07:45:06 +0800) - National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
  • 1997-09-17 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 04:26:43 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
    • 1997-09-17 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 07:13:58 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-09-18 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 16:42:38 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>
  • 1997-09-17 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 05:42:19 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - Ben Cox <cox+@transarc.com>
    • 1997-09-17 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 06:11:20 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - f_estema@alcor.concordia.ca
    • 1997-09-18 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 13:49:22 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
  • 1997-09-17 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 06:14:48 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
    • 1997-09-18 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 17:13:47 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>