From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Message Hash: 6afb5b590f68f2d9868e740e835a44efbadac834901f37d8a5a3c702574c82fb
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970903222635.007669e4@netcom10.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199709040308.XAA30508@mx02.together.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-04 07:30:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 15:30:00 +0800
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 15:30:00 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Subject: Re: FBI calls for mandatory key escrow; Denning on export ctrls (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199709040308.XAA30508@mx02.together.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970903222635.007669e4@netcom10.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:08 PM 9/3/97 -0400, Brian B. Riley wrote:
> ... hmmmm, immediate *lawful* decryption ... which implies that they
>plan to end run the Bill of Rights with some law that permits them to
>walk in and snoop on the spot ... right now to look at my mail which
>needs no key, just a teakettle, they at least have to stop somewhere and
>find a tame judge, which removes at least some of the immediacy.
Finding a judge to sign an order to decrypt the email of a suspected child
pornographer/drug dealer will take all of 30 minutes. I don't think a 30
minute delay will be of any consequence to the government's agenda. Not to
mention that Freeh lied to Congress when he claimed that they would always
use a court order. Even today, court orders are not always required for
wiretaps. This will be no different for future "mandatory" or "involuntary"
GAK.
[BTW, does anybody here have any idea why Freeh might stated that he
preferred "mandatory" GAK over "involutary" GAK? Just curious...]
Back to monkeywrenching,
--Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56.
http://rc5.distributed.net/
Return to September 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”