cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-09-23 - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames…..

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
Message Hash: 77f0eb18edbe840f84f0ae10b1f41725eda25d6c7bc4cfb1c5631f8a50e203a5
Message ID: <v03007803b04dd0d3f10b@[204.254.22.189]>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970922083146.16192A-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-23 20:21:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 04:21:41 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 04:21:41 +0800
To: nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
Subject: Re: "Matchcode" technology sparks privacy flames.....
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970922083146.16192A-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <v03007803b04dd0d3f10b@[204.254.22.189]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 14:02 -0400 9/23/97, nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com wrote:
>> Which law, specifically, would gossiping with (or about) your neighbors
>> violate?
>
>Slander.
>
>Were I to maliciously spread a rumor, and you got fired, or suffered
>economic loss because of my gossip, you could sue me.

Not quite. Truth is an absolute defense against slander and libel. If the
gossip is true, which was my hypothetical, what's the cause of action?

>I can be damaged by information - which may be either wrong or out of
>context.  Should I have no right to recover or correct such things?  If no\

No, you should have no right to "recover" what I know about you. This is a
common beginner's misunderstanding. What you seem to be arguing for is
property rights in information. But that is misguided. To grant you such a
right would be to let you muzzle others who say truthful things, violating
their free speech rights.

That is why many "privacy laws" are censorship in disguise.

-Declan


-------------------------
Declan McCullagh
Time Inc.
The Netly News Network
Washington Correspondent
http://netlynews.com/

Thread