Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net> (19 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Whitehouse Releases Blueprint…

• 1996-11-29 (Fri, 29 Nov 1996 05:16:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Whitehouse Releases Blueprint… - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>

Re: Aghast..

• 1996-12-06 (Fri, 6 Dec 1996 13:51:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Aghast.. - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>

Interactive Week exclusive - Clinton Admin. to announce new Crypto regs. this PM

• 1997-05-08 (Thu, 8 May 1997 23:30:05 +0800) - Interactive Week exclusive - Clinton Admin. to announce new Crypto regs. this PM - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1997-05-08 (Fri, 9 May 1997 06:17:11 +0800) - Re: Clinton Admin. to announce new Crypto regs - Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com>

Re: Clinton Admin. to announce new Crypto regs

• 1997-05-09 (Fri, 9 May 1997 23:48:40 +0800) - Re: Clinton Admin. to announce new Crypto regs - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1997-05-09 (Sat, 10 May 1997 02:24:10 +0800) - Re: Clinton Admin. to announce new Crypto regs - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
  • 1997-05-09 (Sat, 10 May 1997 03:13:45 +0800) - Re: Clinton Admin. to announce new Crypto regs - Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com>

From Inter@ctive Week: Denning no longer backing key escrow?

• 1997-06-02 (Tue, 3 Jun 1997 06:31:44 +0800) - From Inter@ctive Week: Denning no longer backing key escrow? - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>

FBI calls for mandatory key escrow; Denning on export ctrls

• 1997-09-03 (Thu, 4 Sep 1997 05:37:49 +0800) - FBI calls for mandatory key escrow; Denning on export ctrls - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-09-03 (Thu, 4 Sep 1997 06:23:39 +0800) - Re: FBI calls for mandatory key escrow; Denning on export ctrls - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
    • 1997-09-03 (Thu, 4 Sep 1997 07:01:45 +0800) - Re: FBI calls for mandatory key escrow; Denning on export ctrls - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-04 (Fri, 5 Sep 1997 05:50:05 +0800) - Re: FBI calls for mandatory key escrow; Denning on export ctrls - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1997-09-04 (Thu, 4 Sep 1997 08:44:50 +0800) - Re: FBI calls for mandatory key escrow; Denning on export ctrls - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>

More metaphors: Key Recovery like “painting the windshield black?”

• 1997-09-04 (Fri, 5 Sep 1997 04:33:21 +0800) - More metaphors: Key Recovery like “painting the windshield black?” - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>

RE: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill

• 1997-09-10 (Thu, 11 Sep 1997 04:52:23 +0800) - RE: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Hiawatha Bray <wathab@tiac.net>
  • 1997-09-10 (Thu, 11 Sep 1997 05:57:44 +0800) - RE: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1997-09-11 (Thu, 11 Sep 1997 11:23:52 +0800) - RE: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than nobill - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
  • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:51:49 +0800) - RE: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill - Jonathan Wienke <JonWienk@ix.netcom.com>

More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-09-11 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 07:05:37 +0800) - More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:15:38 +0800) - World’s Greatet Search Engine / Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 10:38:17 +0800) - Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
      • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:59:38 +0800) - Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
        • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 07:57:50 +0800) - Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
      • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 19:31:22 +0800) - Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
    • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:55:36 +0800) - Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)
      • 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:29:51 +0800) - Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>

unSAFE won’t pass?

• 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 01:27:28 +0800) - unSAFE won’t pass? - “John Smith” <jsmith58@hotmail.com>
  • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 04:22:12 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 07:32:47 +0800) - Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 10:19:04 +0800) - Re: Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
      • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 10:31:27 +0800) - Re: Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
        • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 11:33:08 +0800) - The “I Told You So” Website - ? the Lunatic <hehehe@dev.null>
    • 1997-09-14 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:41:34 +0800) - Re: Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
  • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 05:18:51 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
  • 1997-09-14 (Sun, 14 Sep 1997 23:40:43 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
    • 1997-09-14 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 03:55:20 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 10:35:08 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>

Re: unSAFE won’t pass?

• 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 11:13:11 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - “John Smith” <jsmith58@hotmail.com>
  • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 20:38:07 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
  • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 23:42:28 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>

Re: unSAFE won’t pass?

• 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:26:33 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>

“Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames…..

• 1997-09-20 (Sun, 21 Sep 1997 03:19:10 +0800) - “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1997-09-20 (Sun, 21 Sep 1997 04:20:23 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - “Imgis Inc.” <BB@imgis.com>
  • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 15:55:48 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 22:54:32 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
      • 1997-09-22 (Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:04:06 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
        • 1997-09-23 (Wed, 24 Sep 1997 02:12:31 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
        • 1997-09-23 (Wed, 24 Sep 1997 04:21:41 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
          • 1997-09-24 (Wed, 24 Sep 1997 23:39:52 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
            • 1997-09-24 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 01:53:54 +0800) - copyright & privacy (was Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames…..) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
              • 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 06:52:32 +0800) - Re: copyright & privacy (was Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames…..) - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
          • 1997-09-24 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 01:50:24 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-09-22 (Tue, 23 Sep 1997 07:23:14 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 18:45:25 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 21:01:15 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 22:48:09 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
  • 1997-09-22 (Tue, 23 Sep 1997 01:05:43 +0800) - Re: “Matchcode” technology sparks privacy flames….. - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>

Crypto Legality Question

• 1997-09-29 (Tue, 30 Sep 1997 04:11:37 +0800) - Crypto Legality Question - “Jim Burnes” <jim.burnes@n-o–s-p-a-m.ssds.com>
  • 1997-09-29 (Tue, 30 Sep 1997 05:35:33 +0800) - Re: Crypto Legality Question - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
    • 1997-09-30 (Tue, 30 Sep 1997 13:44:09 +0800) - Re: Crypto Legality Question - A Loser To Be Flamed Later <altbfl@dev.null>
    • 1997-09-30 (Tue, 30 Sep 1997 17:34:29 +0800) - Re: Crypto Legality Question - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>