1997-09-12 - Re: unSAFE won’t pass?

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: John Smith <jsmith58@hotmail.com>
Message Hash: 7a41edb236ad945d1e39c1ed40c80a0c034280c589e64e45dc0ca3705fe5bece
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970912170428.10375J-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Reply To: <19970912172053.2605.qmail@hotmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-12 21:18:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 05:18:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 05:18:51 +0800
To: John Smith <jsmith58@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: unSAFE won't pass?
In-Reply-To: <19970912172053.2605.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970912170428.10375J-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Don't be too sure. The national security establishment is swarming on
Capitol Hill. They have momentum. SAFE and ProCODE are dead and gutted. 
The chair of House Rules is now eager to push SAFE to the floor for a
vote. What, you think Clinton won't sign the new SAFE bill? 

If the FBI/NSA just wanted to kill SAFE or ProCODE, there were much easier
ways. Just have a committee chair sit on it forever. No, they're in this
for keeps. 

-Declan


On Fri, 12 Sep 1997, John Smith wrote:

> So, does anybody besides me think these crypto bills aren't going
> anywhere?  I still think it's just a trick to get the original bill
> killed.  No way are most congresscritters going to vote for this
> with all the opposition that's coming out.  Just my opinion...

Thread

• Return to September 1997

• Return to “? the Lunatic <hehehe@dev.null>”
• Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>”
• Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>”
• Return to “iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)”
• Return to ““John Smith” <jsmith58@hotmail.com>”
• Return to “Lee Tien <tien@well.com>”
• Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”

• Return to “Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>”

• 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 01:27:28 +0800) - unSAFE won’t pass? - “John Smith” <jsmith58@hotmail.com>
  • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 04:22:12 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 07:32:47 +0800) - Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 10:19:04 +0800) - Re: Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
      • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 10:31:27 +0800) - Re: Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
        • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 11:33:08 +0800) - The “I Told You So” Website - ? the Lunatic <hehehe@dev.null>
    • 1997-09-14 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 00:41:34 +0800) - Re: Note to Net-lobbyists: give it up already, abandon Congress - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
  • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 05:18:51 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
  • 1997-09-14 (Sun, 14 Sep 1997 23:40:43 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
    • 1997-09-14 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 03:55:20 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 10:35:08 +0800) - Re: unSAFE won’t pass? - Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>