cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-10-22 - puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT)

Header Data

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: declan@well.com
Message Hash: 15890f871056b96973e43a1538556a23850957e50fdef72422ecfb4accc13396
Message ID: <199710221356.OAA02611@server.test.net>
Reply To: <v03007804b073ab366f27@[204.254.22.221]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-22 15:10:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:10:14 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:10:14 +0800
To: declan@well.com
Subject: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT)
In-Reply-To: <v03007804b073ab366f27@[204.254.22.221]>
Message-ID: <199710221356.OAA02611@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> writes:
>
> [puff piece on toilets]
> 

No offense Declan, but what has this got to do with cypherpunks,
cryptography, crypto politics etc?  (This is not a perrygram, this is
a message saying I found that particular article uninteresting).

I think we'd be more interested to see an analysis piece of the
political merits/demerits of the pgp5.5 CMR corporate message recovery
technique than of _toilets_.

Where do you stand on the CMR argument?  Or are you staying away from
the hot potato :-)

Adam
-- 
Now officially an EAR violation...
Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/

print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`

Thread