From: Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
To: jon@pgp.com>
Message Hash: 19d5477d9b5a6899e65d077bb057e93e4950aef856525989f102a8b2ca29a849
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971016104056.00bd3d70@mail.pgp.com>
Reply To: <v04001b0eb06a3d206797@[205.180.137.244]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-16 18:04:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:04:16 +0800
From: Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:04:16 +0800
To: jon@pgp.com>
Subject: Re: Praise the Lord! / Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1
In-Reply-To: <v04001b0eb06a3d206797@[205.180.137.244]>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971016104056.00bd3d70@mail.pgp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 03:39 AM 10/16/97 -0600, TruthMonger wrote:
I could be wrong, *but*:
With PGP 5.0, I found that if someone sent me a message that
was encrypted to someone else, I would get a message telling me
that I didn't have the proper key, but would not tell me who the
message *was* encrypted to.
You're right, that was in PGP 5.0. It sucked. It's fixed in 5.5. 5.5 shows
you a nice little box on every message showing you who it is encrypted to.
Jon
-----
Jon Callas jon@pgp.com
Chief Scientist 555 Twin Dolphin Drive
Pretty Good Privacy, Inc. Suite 570
(415) 596-1960 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628 (RSA)
Return to October 1997
Return to “Will Price <wprice@pgp.com>”