Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com> (17 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

What’s really in PGP 5.5?

• 1997-10-07 (Wed, 8 Oct 1997 05:44:17 +0800) - What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-08 (Wed, 8 Oct 1997 11:42:36 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Charles Platt <cp@panix.com>
  • 1997-10-08 (Wed, 8 Oct 1997 13:07:14 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
    • 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 01:22:09 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 02:40:01 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
        • 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 06:55:48 +0800) - access to storage keys, NOT comms keys! (Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-08 (Wed, 8 Oct 1997 20:56:39 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
  • 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 01:22:18 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-10 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 00:58:04 +0800) - Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-10-10 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 04:19:39 +0800) - Re: Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful - Paul Pomes <ppomes@Qualcomm.com>
    • 1997-10-10 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 01:56:46 +0800) - Re: Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful - The Prosecutor <tp@dev.null>
  • 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 07:27:31 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-09 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:45:06 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1997-10-09 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 02:39:33 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-10 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:57:35 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - “John W. Noerenberg” <jwn2@qualcomm.com>
    • 1997-10-10 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 20:24:06 +0800) - do NOT escrow communications keys (Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-13 (Mon, 13 Oct 1997 12:06:53 +0800) - Re: Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
  • 1997-10-10 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:11:54 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)

Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5?

• 1997-10-08 (Wed, 8 Oct 1997 10:20:17 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>
  • 1997-10-08 (Wed, 8 Oct 1997 13:10:35 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>
  • 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 05:54:21 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-09 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 08:15:26 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-09 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 08:53:12 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-09 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:45:49 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - “Carl M. Ellison” <cme@acm.org>
  • 1997-10-09 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 22:26:34 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>

Why Corporate Message Recovery isn’t Key Escrow

• 1997-10-10 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 06:07:04 +0800) - Why Corporate Message Recovery isn’t Key Escrow - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 11:29:14 +0800) - Why Jon Callas keeps picking nits (Re: Why Corporate Message Recovery isn’t Key Escrow) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 12:36:00 +0800) - Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues (Re: Why Jon Callas keeps picking nits) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 18:34:59 +0800) - IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols (Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-13 (Mon, 13 Oct 1997 14:58:00 +0800) - Re: IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols(Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues) - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
        • 1997-10-13 (Mon, 13 Oct 1997 20:57:13 +0800) - Re: IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols(Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
          • 1997-10-13 (Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:02:33 +0800) - Re: IETF policy on refusing to allow politics to weaken protocols (Re: Why Adam Back keeps politicizing technical issues) - “Tony Mione” <mione@boeing.rutgers.edu>
  • 1997-10-11 (Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:03:47 +0800) - Re: Why Jon Callas keeps picking nits (Re: Why Corporate Message Recovery isn’t Key Escrow) - Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
    • 1997-10-11 (Sun, 12 Oct 1997 07:21:14 +0800) - the case for separate comms keys - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-12 (Sun, 12 Oct 1997 18:41:26 +0800) - Re: the case for separate comms keys - Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
      • 1997-10-12 (Sun, 12 Oct 1997 21:10:34 +0800) - Re: the case for separate comms keys - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard

• 1997-10-10 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 05:37:54 +0800) - PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-10 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 06:09:07 +0800) - Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 10:39:09 +0800) - Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 13:22:26 +0800) - Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
        • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 19:02:53 +0800) - Re: PGP CAKware & IETF controlled Open-PGP standard - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Why Corporate Message Recovery isn’t GAK

• 1997-10-10 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 06:34:06 +0800) - Why Corporate Message Recovery isn’t GAK - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 10:04:13 +0800) - Why corporate message recovery IS gak compliant (Re: Why Corporate Message Recovery isn’t GAK) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Attitude and Assumptions

• 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 09:13:50 +0800) - Attitude and Assumptions - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 10:56:57 +0800) - Re: Attitude and Assumptions - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 12:16:07 +0800) - Re: Attitude and Assumptions - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-10-11 (Sat, 11 Oct 1997 21:01:48 +0800) - Re: Attitude and Assumptions - 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
  • 1997-10-13 (Tue, 14 Oct 1997 03:50:16 +0800) - Re: Attitude and Assumptions - “Thomas Junker” <tjunker@mail.phoenix.net>
  • 1997-10-13 (Tue, 14 Oct 1997 06:03:20 +0800) - Re: Attitude and Assumptions - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com

proposal: commercial data recovery

• 1997-10-14 (Tue, 14 Oct 1997 17:58:11 +0800) - proposal: commercial data recovery - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 00:25:46 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
    • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 02:42:53 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 05:21:13 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com>
    • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 06:58:44 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:44:55 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com>
  • 1997-10-15 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 17:38:36 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Will Price <wprice@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-15 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 19:14:42 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Ian Brown <I.Brown@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:11:27 +0800) - anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:22:50 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Gene Hoffman <hoffmang@pgp.com>
        • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 15:43:42 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 10:19:56 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
      • 1997-10-16 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:10:28 +0800) - PGP Inc apology deal (was Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-16 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:39:35 +0800) - PGP Inc apology deal (Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 11:52:29 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
      • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 21:53:42 +0800) - re. GAK resistant design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 17:54:15 +0800) - Praise the Lord! / Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
    • 1997-10-16 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:04:16 +0800) - Re: Praise the Lord! / Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-17 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 17:11:04 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
      • 1997-10-17 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 01:46:57 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-18 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 16:58:04 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
        • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 05:29:33 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 06:44:29 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - “Richard Johnson” <rdump@river.com>
  • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:26:44 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - stewarts@ix.netcom.com

consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action?

• 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 17:14:36 +0800) - consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action? - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@hun.org>
  • 1997-10-17 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 17:30:04 +0800) - Re: consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1997-10-17 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 02:34:27 +0800) - Re: consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action? - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-18 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 10:47:26 +0800) - Re: consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action? - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@hun.org>
  • 1997-10-18 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 17:43:21 +0800) - Re: consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
    • 1997-10-20 (Tue, 21 Oct 1997 05:29:30 +0800) - Re: consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action? - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>

what is purpose of CMR?

• 1997-10-18 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 08:04:16 +0800) - what is purpose of CMR? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-18 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 08:07:57 +0800) - Re: what is purpose of CMR? - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-18 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 17:49:24 +0800) - Re: what is purpose of CMR? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution

• 1997-10-22 (Wed, 22 Oct 1997 18:10:30 +0800) - PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution - mark@unicorn.com
  • 1997-10-22 (Wed, 22 Oct 1997 19:57:44 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution - amp@pobox.com
  • 1997-10-22 (Wed, 22 Oct 1997 21:05:08 +0800) - shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:58:27 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 04:42:37 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-23 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 08:07:27 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution - jmayorga@netscape.com (John Mayorga)
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:17:10 +0800) - Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution) - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 04:45:37 +0800) - Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-23 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 21:42:02 +0800) - Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a - lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 04:25:05 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-10-23 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 21:41:58 +0800) - Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a - lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)

I Broke PGP!!!

• 1997-10-26 (Sun, 26 Oct 1997 18:18:34 +0800) - I Broke PGP!!! - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 16:04:15 +0800) - Re: I Broke PGP!!! - Six <ualdv8@sk.sympatico.ca>
    • 1997-10-28 (Tue, 28 Oct 1997 08:10:32 +0800) - Re: I Broke PGP!!! - Randall Farmer <rfarmer@HiWAAY.net>

RSA Blows Smoke

• 1997-11-02 (Sun, 2 Nov 1997 20:47:15 +0800) - RSA Blows Smoke - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
  • 1997-11-02 (Sun, 2 Nov 1997 22:08:51 +0800) - Re: RSA Blows Smoke - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-11-03 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 04:10:50 +0800) - Re: RSA Blows Smoke - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 08:11:50 +0800) - CMR/ARR revisited - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>