1997-10-17 - Non-conventional

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1c8eeb92d26d8d108e0a062c6fc4dc5a8fdfa8482a4adb82cff5a116d18c5828
Message ID: <199710171449.QAA09086@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-17 15:13:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 23:13:11 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 23:13:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Non-conventional
Message-ID: <199710171449.QAA09086@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim May implied that Cpunx should develop non-conventional email.
Crypto has been declared to be munitions.
Nukes are non-conventional weapons.
Should we be developing nuclear email?
Should we 'email-nuke DC?"

Prespiring minds want to know...

Thread

• Return to October 1997

• Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
• Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”

• Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”

• 1997-10-17 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 23:13:11 +0800) - Non-conventional - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 02:37:58 +0800) - Re: Non-conventional - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-10-19 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 15:24:52 +0800) - Re: Non-conventional - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>