1997-10-19 - Re: Non-conventional

Header Data

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: whgiii@invweb.net
Message Hash: e7f35620b4061a90663958cbb97fe1f27a67549fc80a8d18b0e30b7d0517d83e
Message ID: <199710182123.WAA01536@server.test.net>
Reply To: <199710181814.OAA26560@users.invweb.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-19 07:24:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 15:24:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 15:24:52 +0800
To: whgiii@invweb.net
Subject: Re: Non-conventional
In-Reply-To: <199710181814.OAA26560@users.invweb.net>
Message-ID: <199710182123.WAA01536@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> Anonymous writes:
> >Tim May implied that Cpunx should develop non-conventional email. Crypto
> >has been declared to be munitions.
> >Nukes are non-conventional weapons.
> >Should we be developing nuclear email?
> >Should we 'email-nuke DC?"

Just email them "nuke.fab" :-)

(Readers won't understand that unless they read my contribution to the
true story of the internet).

Adam

Thread

• Return to October 1997

• Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
• Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”

• Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”

• 1997-10-17 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 23:13:11 +0800) - Non-conventional - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 02:37:58 +0800) - Re: Non-conventional - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-10-19 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 15:24:52 +0800) - Re: Non-conventional - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>