cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-10-30 - Re: DEA trying to subpoena book dealers

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
Message Hash: 763a5054b43ecb44433f910a1736cbd10822a28e10c8ce28db3a008f3296fc93
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971030102000.006d802c@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <v03102806b07e577ec20a@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-30 18:25:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 02:25:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 02:25:52 +0800
To: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
Subject: Re: DEA trying to subpoena book dealers
In-Reply-To: <v03102806b07e577ec20a@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971030102000.006d802c@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:44 AM 10/30/1997 -0600, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
>How about a big dog (living in a doghouse or inside the home) that is
>properly trained? I think that it is the best and most sensitive early
>warning system.

Invading Feds shoot big dogs, though I suppose gunshots are a warning.
Little yappy annoying dogs are often a more sensitive early warning
system, and aren't perceived as a threat.

>> >Another question about home defense: it must be really inconvenient
>> >to perform all these self-defense actions naked, which would obviously
>> >happen during these night raids and robberies.
>> >Is that a problem, and if yes, what are the solutions?

Makes it easier for cops to see that you're not a threat,
or that you are a threat.  If your underwear's not Kevlar,
it's not contributing much to the process, and cops are
probably more embarassed about beating up naked people.

On the other hand, naked with blue woad warpaint is a different game :-)


				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Regular Key PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639

Thread