1997-10-15 - Equal rights for receivers

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: bdd76be5f8a23146c81450a0374c1fec18392d539a790ca59ded1834247f60f7
Message ID: <199710150815.KAA25357@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-15 08:40:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 16:40:12 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 16:40:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Equal rights for receivers
Message-ID: <199710150815.KAA25357@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Remind me again:

Why was it OK when the SENDER could choose to encrypt to an additional
key, but it's a threat to the free world if the RECEIVER is allowed to
request the same thing?

Thread

• Return to October 1997

• Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”

• Return to “Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>”

• 1997-10-15 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 16:40:12 +0800) - Equal rights for receivers - Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
  • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:06:04 +0800) - Re: Equal rights for receivers - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:10:29 +0800) - Re: Equal rights for receivers - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>