1997-11-17 - Re: How anonymous?

Header Data

From: Ian Sparkes <isparkes@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Message Hash: 1999719d798b00d27fe16199856fc46dc1c2f4aae99364fd773bc2eba634108a
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19971117102015.006a8080@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
Reply To: <145e152a12d12c409f67fd9e4aaa33f4@anon.efga.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-17 09:25:10 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:25:10 +0800

Raw message

From: Ian Sparkes <isparkes@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:25:10 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Subject: Re: How anonymous?
In-Reply-To: <145e152a12d12c409f67fd9e4aaa33f4@anon.efga.org>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19971117102015.006a8080@q9f47.dmst02.telekom.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 20:36 14.11.97 -0500, you wrote:
>> It seems that if Dick has a certain vocabulary,
>> uses a certain sentence structure, etc., and
>> regularly posts using a nym, that this form and
>> content could be traced to Dick, so the likelihood
>> of the post coming from him and not Jane would
>> be that much increased.
>
>This is true.  Probably most people know who I am.
>
>

If all anonymous posters make a concerted effort to write like Mr.
Nakatuji, not only will anonymity be assured, but the list will be a *lot*
funnier.


            \!!/
          ( o  o )  
+------ooO--(_)--Ooo-+---------------------------------------------------+
|  .oooO             | PGP5 Key Fingerprint:                             |  
| (    )    Oooo.    | 1F59 CADC 951E ADAD 5EA5  9544 FCCE 8E30 4988 551E|
|  \   (    (    )   | "Ian.Sparkes@T-Online.de" "Ian.Sparkes@ac.com"    |
|    \__)    )  /    |                                                   |
|           (__/     | Life empiricist and confused ethical hedonist     |
+--------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| I'm not your lawer, you're not my client. This is therefore not advice |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+






Thread