From: Matthew Nuckolls <mnuck@umr.edu>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 32a44ea4fcdfc133652287917137b353d2558584a8406c1b9dddaa2cd18652ec
Message ID: <19971101145349.14850@ultra7.umr.edu>
Reply To: <v03102809b0810793884b@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-01 21:06:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 05:06:39 +0800
From: Matthew Nuckolls <mnuck@umr.edu>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 05:06:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: cute.
In-Reply-To: <v03102809b0810793884b@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <19971101145349.14850@ultra7.umr.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Warning: The following message is apolitical.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[snip]
> I wonder. There might be an argument for just laying low until
> cryptoanarchy starves the bloated cancerous growth.
>
> Amad3us
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> iQCVAwUBNFt6ffKMuKFNFivhAQHagwP8DiNphzTEBFIxjMfuk0GMoTaSwY4Etjyb
> Q234GnFkf5iqWgRsDnNJWeiQzfli9EV+/5xA/eY80N+AQxbln6eFwkG8U9btMoqS
> Y7NCNwU6tDSckAOSSPOtdikZBxrNclW7ZK0ueuuHvFZGx5ciWCUBbx6bcxzphmhl
> bWPRWC/asbc=
> =I0Qy
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> mQCNAzRbd7MAAAEEAONwsEpUgiezyfP6lxBzM5SfHJS6MK12JyR09KBZp2rrW680
> 4vbKAO/oteftRRM1jYYaQM6pUd2Tbb9z+cSuQGr2GH9kQ0Y7bllh89E1PItj7frG
> ARSCbt1gbbXDXEICY8Ne1zZB7FfMt2qGVBdrKG/i2vfdZa5+n/KMuKFNFivhAAUR
> tCNBbWFkM3VzIDxjeXBoZXJwdW5rc0BjeWJlcnBhc3MubmV0Pg==
> =6dKS
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
What's the point in distribuing your public key through the same
channels as a signature? Kinda defeats the purpose. Esp since I can't
verify that the given public key is indeed yours, since you're anonymous.
--
Matthew Nuckolls
mnuck@umr.edu
Return to November 1997
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”