1997-11-05 - Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called, etc. etc.

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Message Hash: 36d7d70799e1f251a534235597728cec233868a17c3a5cff9c38b5a90830d818
Message ID: <199711050210.DAA18934@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-05 02:45:15 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 10:45:15 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 10:45:15 +0800
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Why Jodi Hoffman must be called, etc. etc.
Message-ID: <199711050210.DAA18934@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Lizard wrote:
>At 07:39 PM 11/4/97 -0500, Jodi Hoffman wrote:
>>You're a bright one, aren't you?  
>>Not that I feel I owe anyone an explanation, but since you took the time 
>>and trouble to write so damn much.....
>>CIN donated the webspace.  Another Christian organization arranged for 
>>someone to build the website and, well, here I am.  
>>Aside from the fact that I didn't want to have to pay for _anything_, I 
>>think that was very generous of them, don't you?
>
>So, allying yourself with people who would gladly force *your* childen to
>pray to *their* God doesn't bother you in the least. Fascinating.

More telling, she doesn't seem to have a problem using a religious (and
therefore tax-exempt) organization to push a political agenda. Apparently
that whole 'separation of church and state' thing only applies when it's
convenient.

If religions want to play politics, the least we can do is get them to pay
for the privilege. I'd feel a certain guilty pleasure seeing some of those
bottom-feeders taxed into penury.







Thread