1997-11-28 - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable?
Header Data
From: lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: acfe4b97f0a4e9c54f8307516b28dede52e683274cac2e8055ba54d4389ea7d6
Message ID: <slrn67tug3.an.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
Reply To: <19971125.060408.8463.10.goddesshera@juno.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-28 17:17:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:17:03 +0800
Raw message
From: lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:17:03 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? -- is it usable?
In-Reply-To: <19971125.060408.8463.10.goddesshera@juno.com>
Message-ID: <slrn67tug3.an.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
* Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>Do you think that it is a good idea to migrate from pgp 2.6.3 to
>pgp 5.0 now?
No.
Thread
- Return to November 1997
Return to December 1997
- Return to “goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)”
- Return to “lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)”
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”
- 1997-11-25 (Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:11:49 +0800) - PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:17:03 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 05:37:06 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
- 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:52:04 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 05:37:06 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:17:03 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)