1997-12-02 - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable?

Header Data

From: lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: a5e643eaf57d5b79743143b7d43eab3e0b4aa34bdf87edcfb0db3e5801923005
Message ID: <slrn688i4j.pbj.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
Reply To: <199711282127.QAA27009@users.invweb.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-02 17:52:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:52:04 +0800

Raw message

From: lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:52:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? -- is it usable?
In-Reply-To: <199711282127.QAA27009@users.invweb.net>
Message-ID: <slrn688i4j.pbj.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



* William H. Geiger III wrote:
>   at 05:06 PM, lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) said:
>>* Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>>>Do you think that it is a good idea to migrate from pgp 2.6.3 to
>>>pgp 5.0 now?
>
>>No.
>
>Care to justify that?

In which way? It's a clear statement.

Thread

• Return to November 1997

• Return to December 1997

• Return to “goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)”
• Return to “lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)”

• Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”

• 1997-11-25 (Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:11:49 +0800) - PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)
  • 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:17:03 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
    • 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 05:37:06 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:52:04 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)