cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-11-18 - Re: List Robustness

Header Data

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Message Hash: d56d091038d45534486f5ecb0a7570559e6b8a05a45889aec2fa1f146d8b4475
Message ID: <199711181135.LAA00174@server.test.net>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19971117190222.00688de4@popd.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-18 20:53:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 04:53:13 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 04:53:13 +0800
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: List Robustness
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971117190222.00688de4@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199711181135.LAA00174@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> Usenet is a _great_ place to run Blacknet, because background noise
> is your friend, and the uncensorability depends on piggybacking on
> the firehose.

Piggy-backing the firehose to borrow it's uncensorability was the idea
with the prototype eternity server.  I am not sure USENET is really
that reliable is the problem for it.  So perhaps you can boost
reliability by redundancy, secret split messages.

Adam
-- 
Now officially an EAR violation...
Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/

print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`

Thread