cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-12-18 - Re: message dependent hashcash => no double spend database (Re:hashcash spam prevention & firewalls)

Header Data

From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
To: phelix@vallnet.com
Message Hash: 7034113f96eae1c457289dc7c7a397a2521c4f5cbf6acdc61e79432f7ab00f7b
Message ID: <v03102806b0bdff5466dc@[208.129.55.202]>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19971214234241.03899220@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-18 17:50:01 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 01:50:01 +0800

Raw message

From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 01:50:01 +0800
To: phelix@vallnet.com
Subject: Re: message dependent hashcash => no double spend database  (Re:hashcash spam prevention & firewalls)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971214234241.03899220@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
Message-ID: <v03102806b0bdff5466dc@[208.129.55.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>On 17 Dec 1997 02:21:48 -0600, in local.cypherpunks you wrote:
>Yes, but if you just phase it in over time, what benefit, if any, will
>users see until hashcash is fully deployed.  Until that time, people will
>still have to accept email without hashcash or risk losing important
>messages. 

If I want to send an important message to you and I get a hashcash rejection reponse and I'm given a Web site where I can get a Java applet to create the hashcash, I'll do it.  We all know we must affix postage to our snailmail. Its time to embrace the postal system's paradigm and educate the reminder of the Net.  Those who risk missing an email or two will totally stop their SPAM. Those who won't, won't.

>I don't see people adopting hashcash unless there is some intermediate
>benefit to doing so.

All we need is a small, influential, group to sing the praises of hashcash.  I'm sure Declan and Wired will pick up the banner if what we come up with works.  After that IETF activity is a far gone conclusion.

--Steve

Thread