From: Steve Mynott <steve@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 06:48:37 +0800
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: non-transferable signatures (Re: Crypto Kong penetration.)
In-Reply-To: <19980116104604.39449@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <19980116224808.11732@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 03:30:05PM +0000, Adam Back typed:

> You can use non-transferable signatures for private email, but it's
> probably better not to sign publically posting messages, unless you
> have a persistent anonymous nym unlinkable with your meat space
> persona.

Hmm this is a very good point which may explain the limited use of PGP
on this list anyway.

I also wonder whether the low uptake of PGP is more due to it being too
hard to use between different mailers and too hard to use generally for
the nontechnical.

SMIME of course despite bad cypherpunk karma is easy and maybe even 
works between mailers.

-- 
Steve Mynott <steve@tightrope.demon.co.uk>               tel: 0956 265761
pgp: 1024/D9C69DF9       88 91 7A 48 40 72 BD AC  4D 71 59 47 01 AC 56 E9

There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is
a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle. --A.  Einstein