Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com> (11 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Crypto Kong penetration.

• 1998-01-15 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 02:47:18 +0800) - Re: Crypto Kong penetration. - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1998-01-15 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 03:19:12 +0800) - Re: Crypto Kong penetration. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
  • 1998-01-15 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 04:15:36 +0800) - Re: Crypto Kong penetration. - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1998-01-16 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 18:52:53 +0800) - Re: Crypto Kong penetration. - Steve Mynott <steve@tightrope.demon.co.uk>
    • 1998-01-16 (Sat, 17 Jan 1998 06:32:43 +0800) - non-transferable signatures (Re: Crypto Kong penetration.) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1998-01-16 (Sat, 17 Jan 1998 06:48:37 +0800) - Re: non-transferable signatures (Re: Crypto Kong penetration.) - Steve Mynott <steve@tightrope.demon.co.uk>

Re: (eternity) God’s Own Backup Medium

• Unknown thread root
  • 1998-01-15 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 01:14:51 +0800) - Re: (eternity) God’s Own Backup Medium - Ryan Lackey <rdl@mit.edu>
    • 1998-01-16 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 10:03:32 +0800) - remailer resistancs to attack - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1998-01-16 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 18:00:36 +0800) - Re: remailer resistancs to attack - Ryan Lackey <rdl@mit.edu>
      • 1998-01-16 (Sat, 17 Jan 1998 01:42:40 +0800) - Re: remailer resistancs to attack - Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
    • 1998-01-16 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 10:43:57 +0800) - Re: remailer resistancs to attack - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-01-16 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 18:05:37 +0800) - Re: remailer resistancs to attack - “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>
      • 1998-01-19 (Mon, 19 Jan 1998 18:01:46 +0800) - Re: (eternity) Re: remailer resistancs to attack - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
        • 1998-01-19 (Tue, 20 Jan 1998 02:46:02 +0800) - Re: (eternity) Re: remailer resistancs to attack - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>

Re: let’s do it: NYT ad with hash of fingerprints (fwd)

• 1998-01-19 (Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:24:44 +0800) - Re: let’s do it: NYT ad with hash of fingerprints (fwd) - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1998-01-19 (Tue, 20 Jan 1998 06:06:35 +0800) - Re: let’s do it: NYT ad with hash of fingerprints (fwd) - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
  • 1998-01-19 (Tue, 20 Jan 1998 06:38:46 +0800) - ‘Twas brillig, and the vetter seems to boost haywire - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>

Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN]

• 1998-01-20 (Tue, 20 Jan 1998 22:31:48 +0800) - Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
  • 1998-01-21 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 06:10:53 +0800) - Re: Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>
    • 1998-01-21 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 07:24:02 +0800) - Re: Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
    • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:18:44 +0800) - Re: Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - Alan Olsen <alan@clueserver.org>
      • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:33:46 +0800) - Re: Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
  • 1998-01-21 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 07:50:05 +0800) - Re: Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
    • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 04:46:10 +0800) - Re: Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
    • 1998-01-23 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 11:51:27 +0800) - Re: Intel introduces new compression technology for surfers [CNN] - Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>

Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage

• 1998-01-21 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 05:46:32 +0800) - Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@hun.org>
  • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 09:57:37 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 13:51:20 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
      • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:05:12 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 23:13:38 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - Michael Stutz <stutz@dsl.org>
      • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 01:06:11 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
    • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 17:07:06 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - phelix@vallnet.com
      • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 01:09:47 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 05:07:14 +0800) - Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 05:40:48 +0800) - Re: Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
        • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 05:56:22 +0800) - Re: Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - Michael Stutz <stutz@dsl.org>
        • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 06:55:26 +0800) - Re: Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - John Blair <jdblair@frodo.tucc.uab.edu>
      • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 07:29:00 +0800) - Re: Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - Brad Threatt <bradt@ehq.com>
        • 1998-01-23 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 15:59:39 +0800) - Re: Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
      • 1998-01-23 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 15:23:41 +0800) - Re: Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
        • 1998-01-23 (Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:24:44 +0800) - Re: Why no “Banner Ad Eaters”? - Michael Stutz <stutz@dsl.org>
      • 1998-02-03 (Tue, 3 Feb 1998 22:32:07 +0800) - Spammers - Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com>
        • 1998-02-03 (Tue, 3 Feb 1998 22:48:39 +0800) - Re: Spammers - Simon Fraser <simonf@uk.uu.net>
        • 1998-02-04 (Wed, 4 Feb 1998 13:26:42 +0800) - Re: Spammers - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
        • 1998-02-04 (Wed, 4 Feb 1998 14:23:50 +0800) - Re: Spammers - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
        • 1998-02-04 (Wed, 4 Feb 1998 17:43:52 +0800) - Re: Spammers - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
    • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 03:56:56 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - bill.stewart@pobox.com
  • 1998-01-22 (Fri, 23 Jan 1998 04:03:48 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - bill.stewart@pobox.com
    • 1998-01-23 (Sat, 24 Jan 1998 06:41:03 +0800) - Re: Revenge on the Nerds -Maureen on a rampage - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Information on key handling with Microsoft products (fwd)

• 1998-01-27 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 02:56:58 +0800) - Information on key handling with Microsoft products (fwd) - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>

Sweedish police weed out hackers

• 1998-01-27 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 02:57:57 +0800) - Sweedish police weed out hackers - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>

Latest Clinton dodge?

• 1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 03:03:24 +0800) - Latest Clinton dodge? - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 04:41:40 +0800) - RE: Latest Clinton dodge? - “Roger J Jones” <cyber@ibpinc.com>
  • 1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 05:47:16 +0800) - RE: Latest Clinton dodge? - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 05:52:49 +0800) - RE: Latest Clinton dodge? - “Roger J Jones” <cyber@ibpinc.com>
      • 1998-01-27 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 10:00:47 +0800) - RE: Latest Clinton dodge? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
        • 1998-01-27 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 20:29:52 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
          • 1998-01-27 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:35:00 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
            • 1998-01-27 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 02:10:29 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - John Blair <jdblair@frodo.tucc.uab.edu>
              • 1998-01-28 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 12:29:38 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
              • 1998-01-28 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 12:48:03 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - Mac Norton <mnorton@cavern.uark.edu>
    • 1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 06:57:48 +0800) - RE: Latest Clinton dodge? - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
  • 1998-01-26 (Tue, 27 Jan 1998 07:19:40 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1998-01-27 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 03:01:46 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
    • 1998-01-28 (Wed, 28 Jan 1998 08:30:49 +0800) - Re: Latest Clinton dodge? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Spyking snips: Police MDT’s + cia/russian spying

• 1998-01-28 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 02:09:51 +0800) - Spyking snips: Police MDT’s + cia/russian spying - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
  • 1998-01-28 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 03:21:33 +0800) - Re: Spyking snips: Police MDT’s + cia/russian spying - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
  • 1998-01-28 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 03:22:00 +0800) - Re: Spyking snips: Police MDT’s + cia/russian spying - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
  • 1998-02-02 (Tue, 3 Feb 1998 05:52:32 +0800) - Re: Spyking snips: Police MDT’s + cia/russian spying - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)

Can someone look this up? (fwd)

• 1998-01-29 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 08:25:42 +0800) - Can someone look this up? (fwd) - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
  • 1998-01-29 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 09:01:59 +0800) - Re: Can someone look this up? (fwd) - Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>
  • 1998-01-29 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 23:49:12 +0800) - Re: Can someone look this up? (fwd) - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>

More reasons why Nynex is evil… (fwd)

• 1998-01-29 (Thu, 29 Jan 1998 22:55:02 +0800) - More reasons why Nynex is evil… (fwd) - Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>