From: Ray Arachelian <sunder@sundernet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 02:46:02 +0800
To: platypus@acmeonline.net
Subject: Re: (eternity) Re: remailer resistancs to attack
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.980119192756.205C-100000@shirley>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.980119133722.26286D-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} wrote:

> How would this be implermented.  If you are able to trace backwards so you
> know who to notify then you don't have anonminity.


It could be done if the remailer software is rewritten.  When you send a
message, include instructions for the last remailer to write a message to
either usenet or a web page on the same net as the remailer with a sender
selected id.  Have these pooled and posted every day/week, etc...

If your mail bounces it you'll know by reading a page off a server, or a
message off usenet... 


i.e. for the last one in the chain
::Request bounce "xyzzy12345"

Dont post anything other than the bounce strings to the world.  (i.e.
don't post the intended recipient's name, etc...)


=====================================Kaos=Keraunos=Kybernetos==============
.+.^.+.|  Ray Arachelian    |Prying open my 3rd eye.  So good to see |./|\.
..\|/..|sunder@sundernet.com|you once again. I thought you were      |/\|/\
<--*-->| ------------------ |hiding, and you thought that I had run  |\/|\/
../|\..| "A toast to Odin,  |away chasing the tail of dogma. I opened|.\|/.
.+.v.+.|God of screwdrivers"|my eye and there we were....            |.....
======================= http://www.sundernet.com ==========================