1998-01-19 - Re: (eternity) Re: remailer resistancs to attack

Header Data

From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
To: “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>
Message Hash: 57e1ba2ebbc9c8254e29393399f1cf5c6fa189ff18076a5c0598ec1800f5d55d
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.980119192756.205C-100000@shirley>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19980116045037.031a4b40@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-19 10:01:46 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 18:01:46 +0800

Raw message

From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 18:01:46 +0800
To: "Robert A. Costner" <pooh@efga.org>
Subject: Re: (eternity) Re: remailer resistancs to attack
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980116045037.031a4b40@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.980119192756.205C-100000@shirley>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, Robert A. Costner wrote:

[...]

> The remailer network is not designed
> to be robust or fault tolerant.  There is no error notification to the
> user.  
[...]
How would this be implermented.  If you are able to trace backwards so you
know who to notify then you don't have anonminity.

- -- 
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep.  ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNMMPA6QK0ynCmdStAQG8qgP8ClMmPfeGkEJ9Fydfb5i3n1ARuKRV+nET
cLIt9GfU9vlrashs+2Shx/c8bz67+rl0eOAdgNBbDlW8Fe1Qzb9EfRCn24f+ZL0K
+7PyBc+2YTfWOTrmEGihNuLnKUtFUNRrjyC0+PHWDCTOZx+W9LzAxKsbw8TzPWAF
zMG5ooTbM+E=
=2cCi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread