cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1998-02-04 - Re: Spammers

Header Data

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
To: Simon Fraser <simonf@uk.uu.net>
Message Hash: 3ba35fe9353cf4c284e569b6219ba6e1f7e59afa403335aedac1d60e52dc9882
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980203203912.007c0e10@otc.net>
Reply To: <v03102807b0fcd856e294@[207.79.65.77]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-04 05:26:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 13:26:42 +0800

Raw message

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 13:26:42 +0800
To: Simon Fraser <simonf@uk.uu.net>
Subject: Re: Spammers
In-Reply-To: <v03102807b0fcd856e294@[207.79.65.77]>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980203203912.007c0e10@otc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 02:37 PM 2/3/98 +0000, Simon Fraser wrote:
>
>On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, Chip Mefford wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be nice to hold uu.net culpable for all their spamming ways.
They
>> want to own the internet, let them hang for it.
>
>http://www.us.uu.net/support/usepolicy/
>It would be nice to differentiate between the spammers themselves and the
>ISP they use. 
>
>
>Simon.

Yes. Otherwise an ISP loses common-carrier status and is thus
responsible for the content of its traffic.

Blame the junk-faxers, not the telcos.  



David Honig 			honig@alum.mit.edu
---------------------------------------------------
Is Monica Lewinsky endorsing kneepads for Nike yet?

Thread