1998-02-03 - Spammers

Header Data

From: Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ab93895fa24fe7150afc58f8a91cae50f843b6c9adf4defa023828d52270b0c7
Message ID: <v03102807b0fcd856e294@[207.79.65.77]>
Reply To: <34c704c2.971366@128.2.84.191>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-03 14:32:07 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 22:32:07 +0800

Raw message

From: Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 22:32:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Spammers
In-Reply-To: <34c704c2.971366@128.2.84.191>
Message-ID: <v03102807b0fcd856e294@[207.79.65.77]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Good day list.

I was just in the process of mailing off a copy of the GNU
junk email contract to some sammer or another, and it occured to
me;

It would certainly be nice to collect that 10buks a hit for this
crap,

It will never happen,

Seems alot the spam I recieve originates with a node from uu.net and I am
no big
fan of Ubermesiter John Sidgmore,

Wouldn't it be nice to hold uu.net culpable for all their spamming ways. They
want to own the internet, let them hang for it.

Just a thought, anyone intested in doing a class action to recover
email processing fees?

luv
chipper







Thread