1998-02-09 - Re: Soft Tempest

Header Data

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
To: Tim May <jya@pipeline.com>
Message Hash: 220a94e6af95ac99118cc940b50c0d2fb331dbca6c62f15572f5090a883bb8a0
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980209093105.007b3780@otc.net>
Reply To: <tw7k9b5uzhy.fsf@the-great-machine.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-09 17:58:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:58:52 +0800

Raw message

From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:58:52 +0800
To: Tim May <jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: Soft Tempest
In-Reply-To: <tw7k9b5uzhy.fsf@the-great-machine.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980209093105.007b3780@otc.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 10:14 PM 2/8/98 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>At 9:19 PM -0800 2/8/98, Ryan Lackey wrote:
>
>
>The physics suggests just the opposite: the RF emissions from laptops are
>expected to be lower from first principles, and, I have heard, are
>measurably much lower. (I say "have heard" because I don't have any access
>to RF measurement equipment...I once spent many hours a day working inside
>a Faraday cage, but that was many years ago.)
...later...
>But before going this route, I'd want to see some measurements. Laptops
>might already be "quiet enough." (Measurements are needed to determine the
>effectiveness of any proposed RF shielding anyway, so....)

The interference that laptops can cause with avionics is 
prima facie evidence that laptops are not quiet.


>The first principles part is that the deflection yokes in a CRT are the
>largest radiated component of what got named "van Eck radiation." (I'd just
>call it RF, but whatever.)
>
>Laptops are missing this component. (It might be interesting to see the
>radiated RF numbers for various kinds of flat panel displays.)

They are not missing the periodic pixel clocking signals though.


...
>With some of these glasses, gargoyle-style, one could completely encase the
>laptop in a shielded case (like a Zero Haliburton) and then use a palm
>keypad...

Yes, but cables radiate.  Wires are antennae.  Used to be a big problem
when laptops had wired mice.

BTW, in van Eck's original paper, he gives a way to make screen spying
a little tougher: pick random raster-lines to draw instead of the usual
order.  This of course would not be a significant barrier to modern
interception.

------

Enrico Fermi used to tune a regular music radio to a cyclotron(?) so he
could tell
that it was working, I've read.






------------------------------------------------------------
      David Honig                   Orbit Technology
     honig@otc.net                  Intaanetto Jigyoubu

		Lewinsky for President '2012




	
















Thread