1998-02-18 - Re: Is spam really a problem?
Header Data
From: proff@iq.org
To: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Message Hash: 4431b31c07ebab6d858204bc422e89e77e4f497f2191678036b6e52af9fe3150
Message ID: <19980218050405.1567.qmail@iq.org>
Reply To: <199802181733.SAA26244@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-18 18:27:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 02:27:01 +0800
Raw message
From: proff@iq.org
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 02:27:01 +0800
To: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Subject: Re: Is spam really a problem?
In-Reply-To: <199802181733.SAA26244@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <19980218050405.1567.qmail@iq.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> PS: I'm slightly anonymous in this message
> because I fear that if I used my real name,
> some jerk would decide to sign me up for
> every spam source on the planet, to prove
> a point.
>
> M
Too late. Someone subscribed you to cypherpunks
already.
Cheers,
Julian.
Thread
Return to February 1998
- Return to “eristic@gryzmak.lodz.pdi.net (Marek Jedlinski)”
- Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
- Return to “proff@iq.org”
- Return to “sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>”
- Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”
- Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”
- 1998-02-18 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 01:49:25 +0800) - Is spam really a problem? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1998-02-18 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 02:27:01 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - proff@iq.org
- 1998-02-18 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 02:27:21 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1998-02-21 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 09:40:18 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - eristic@gryzmak.lodz.pdi.net (Marek Jedlinski)
- 1998-02-21 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 09:51:32 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
- 1998-02-21 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 09:40:18 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - eristic@gryzmak.lodz.pdi.net (Marek Jedlinski)
- 1998-02-18 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 04:58:32 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1998-02-18 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 06:14:33 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
- 1998-02-18 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 07:27:05 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1998-02-19 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 08:37:42 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1998-02-19 (Fri, 20 Feb 1998 04:34:51 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1998-02-19 (Fri, 20 Feb 1998 04:47:37 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1998-02-19 (Fri, 20 Feb 1998 05:30:22 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1998-02-20 (Fri, 20 Feb 1998 11:45:11 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)