From: “David E. Smith” <dave@bureau42.ml.org>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 781ec5fba46e6b19b5913e900b04acbd884e9e94da196c1c6ab41a76e4ba8e94
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980320001829.6979B-100000@bureau42.ml.org>
Reply To: <v03007805b1374f44e903@[168.161.105.216]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-20 01:19:37 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:19:37 -0800 (PST)
From: "David E. Smith" <dave@bureau42.ml.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:19:37 -0800 (PST)
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: Will New Sendmail Block Remailers?
In-Reply-To: <v03007805b1374f44e903@[168.161.105.216]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980320001829.6979B-100000@bureau42.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> So I'm told that the new version of sendmail (8.9) has the same antispam
> features as 8.8 -- only difference is in defaults. True?
The closest to a noticeable change I've spotted is that the simple
anti-relaying rules (check_rcpt) are now part of the sendmail.cf by
default. (No longer do they have to be downloaded separately and hacked in
by hand.) There are more complex anti-relaying configurations that can be
specified now, also (for permitting certain parties/domains to relay, or
to only restrict certain groups from relaying).
In other words, not much has changed.
dave
----- David E. Smith, P O Box 324, Cape Girardeau MO 63702
http://bureau42.base.org/people/dave/ dave@bureau42.ml.org
Random IRC Quote:
[topic(#linux)] New MS motto: "Gehirnwesche die Kinder, wenn sie jung
sind. In ihren Erwachsensein sind sie Ihre bereiten Sklaven. [TM]"
(Brainwash the children. When they are adults they will be your slaves)
topic set by Bascule [Sat Jan 24 05:57:42 1998]
Return to March 1998
Return to “Yupin Mungdee <snickers@mejl.com>”